Simon Bradfield Photography
  • Home
  • Intro & Galleries
  • Tear Sheets/In Use
  • About Simon
  • Blog
  • Prices
  • Contact

In The Pursuit Of Landscapes

20/11/2013

6 Comments

 
Picture
First and foremost, it’s a wonderful thing to be back in Bucks. I grew up here, I went to school here, I learnt to love curry here, but in my early twenties I followed a well-beaten path (the A40) up to town where I remained for something like fifteen years. There’s been a fair bit of distraction and travel along the way, culminating in a two year stint in the wilds of the Surrey Hills, but as of two months ago I was, yet again, a resident of Buckinghamshire. And being a decent sort of fellow I brought my wife and daughter along too.

I’ve returned to Bucks as a photographer with a penchant for landscape & travel imagery, images that I’ll sell as prints and through the iStock image library, which is part of the vast Getty Images empire. What this all means in practice is I now live in an extremely photogenic area, which I’m fortunate enough to know pretty well, but have never really explored with a photographer’s head on. With such beautiful landscape right on the doorstep, it’s a good position to be in. 

When it comes to landscape photography I’m a true believer in the Golden Hour. To a non-photographer this may sound like some ill-fated Doomsday cult (that or happy hour in one of the county’s better pubs), but in this particular instance it refers to a tantalising yet small window of opportunity around sunrise and sunset when the sun, low in the sky, bathes your subject in a warm, flattering light. It could be a landscape, it could be a portrait, it could be a rusty old Austin Allegro, but if you photograph it in the soft light of the Golden Hour it’ll look infinitely better than if you shot it in harsh midday sun. 

Not only that, an impressive sunrise or sunset will improve any scene, and photographers the world over do get all in a flutter as these moments of photographic alchemy draw near. So from Uluru to the Taj Mahal all the way to the Chiltern Hills, you will see photographers (usually men, almost always sans spouse/partner) peering through the viewfinders of an assortment of cameras, an expression of expectant hope on their collective faces. Will this be the shot that gets onto the cover of National Geographic...

That was me last Wednesday afternoon, revisiting one of my old haunts from way back when. Coombe Hill and the Golden Pineapple (the Boer War Memorial, to give it its proper name), a properly splendid Chiltern Hills’ landscape. A scene which I hoped I would be able to do justice to. As it was, the sky the previous evening and that Wednesday morning had been glorious, a riotous panoply of pink, gold and blue, and whilst that’s no guarantee that Wednesday evening would be anything special you never get the shot by sitting at home peering out the window. So off I trot. 

It had been many years since my last visit to Coombe Hill but it all felt reassuringly familiar. The same expanse of grass near the car park, an area sometimes populated by sheep but not today, and then a line of trees. Beyond the trees more grass then a wonderful moment when the hill drops away and the landscape just opens up. Ahead of you there is the elegant hill with the beautiful name (Cymbeline’s Castle) and fields and trees, there’s a golf course or two, farms, pylons and houses, and away in the distance the sprawl of Aylesbury. 

And, in the near distance, overlooking this grand scene since 1904 sits the proud form of the Boer War Memorial. It’s a genuinely impressive location.

I had three quarters of an hour before the sun would eventually set but the omens were good. The horizon was a bit hazy, but with a scene like this that’s not necessarily a bad thing (and seeing as it was late Autumn it could certainly have been worse). As an added bonus there was some interesting high cloud, always handy when the sun gets lower. We might be in business.

As far as cameras are concerned, these days I travel light. For years I hauled around a magnificent yet hefty Canon EOS 5D mark II (plus a comprehensive line-up of lenses). It’s a fabulous camera which, over the years, has helped me capture some beautiful moments in some spectacular locations. I believe it also gave me tennis elbow, so last year I traded in some old kit and a bunch of lenses and got hold of a Fuji X-Pro 1. Weighing less than one of the lenses I traded it for, this 16MP marvel can all but match what the full-frame Canon can do, and it does it without destroying any body parts in the process. Which I find makes for a far more enjoyable photographic session.

Back on the hill the sun dropped lower, and the trees on top of Cymbeline’s Castle start to stand out and be silhouetted by a golden haze on the horizon. Part of me is wishing I had a longer range than the 18-55mm lens I’m using, but I’m sure if I had a longer lens I’d be wanting to go wider. Some people are never happy.

It’s getting colder, but the sky is doing wonderful things. We’ve had glorious golds as the sun drops to the horizon. The haze filters the light beautifully, and the sun itself is a bright white disk (though obviously never look directly into sun, that would be silly). Soon the golds are replaced by vivid pinks and orange, and the high cloud I’d noticed earlier really comes into its own.

I’ve been busy shooting, dashing down the hill a short way to get some shots from one angle, then clambering back up for another, then off to the Memorial to capture its heroic silhouette against that amazing sky. It’s frantic but it’s joyous at the same time, and as the light finally begins to fade for good I head back to the car. I’m again thankful that I’m back in Bucks. It really does feel like I’m home.

6 Comments
Nishi Sharma link
4/1/2014 03:22:52 am

Hi Simon

I am I read your comments on iStock site about you switching to using X-Pro 1. I am primarily a wedding, portrait and event photographer though I also shoot botanical photos. I am wondering if you'd be willing to share things you have to watch for when submitting images shot with X-Pro 1 to iStock, though I am with another photo agency that specialises in botanical photos. I guess the principle might be the same. You said your first poppy image was rejected but then accepted later. I have been a Nikon D3 user for many years (only shoot RAW) and have just switched to X-Pro 1. Hope you don't mind me contacting you. Many thanks.

Reply
Simon Bradfield
4/1/2014 07:55:35 am

Hi there Nishi

Nice to hear from you. I have to say I'm a big fan of the X-Pro 1, it's a fabulous camera. I have used Canon DSLRs for many years now (30D, 40D & then a 5D II) and truth be told I just got bored of hauling so much kit around.

For what I do (I mainly shoot landscapes, as you'll see here and on iStock), and the Fuji does the job perfectly. Sure, the sensor may be a bit smaller than full frame, but if you do some pixel peeping (and if you submit stock images you probably do already) you'd say there's not much in it. Certainly not enough to warrant hauling all the extra weight of a DSLR (plus lenses) around. My thinking is I'd rather get to a location happy & without a bad back. That's just me though...

So it suits my purposes, and it may suit your botanical needs too. I'd suggest checking out a secondhand one (the release of the XE-2 would mean there's plenty of deals to be done), you could be pleasantly surprised by the price. Also check out the Fuji Rumors website, they often have links to other photographers using the Fuji (eg Riley Joseph, Kevin Mullins) so you'll see what is achievable.

Hope that helps, let me know how it goes

Simon

Reply
Nishi Sharma link
4/1/2014 08:59:48 am

Hi Simon, thank you so much for taking time to reply to my email. You mentioned Kevin Mullins in your reply. Yes I was in touch with him before investing in my X-Pro 1. His assurance made me go for it.

I got a very good deal on X-Pro 1: body, two lenses and bellingham camera bag, all for £950. AND £100 cash back on Fuji 60mm. I am really pleased with the quality of images I get from it, especially at high ISO. I have been carrying a huge amount of gear for weddings, 2 of everything. Nikon D3 with prime zoom lenses + the lighting kit for bad weather. I used to come home at the end of the day with stunning images but with a sore back!!

Indeed X-Pro 1 will save my back too. I have no concerns about the IQ for wedding and event photography. In fact it performs very well at high ISOs.

My only concern was about stock images, as some agencies are very tough on QC. I had submitted some images that I took with X100 and they went through without any problem.

However, I came across a blog by Damian Lovegrove, in which he expressed concerns about colour smearing in X-Pro 1, though it might have been cleared in Lightroom 5.3, not sure. So, I thought I will check it out with others before I go and spend days shooting images for stock only to be turned down later. I went to DP Review hoping that some stock photographers might be able to answer my concerns: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/52824107. In fact some one called Chris Dodkin pointed me to the iStock link, to your posting.

BTW, what changes did you have to make to your poppy photo for it to be accepted by iStock?

Many thanks again Simon for your help.

Nishi

Reply
Simon Bradfield
4/1/2014 10:32:40 am

Hi there Nishi

I'm happy to say I've had very few issues/rejections with iStock with the X-Pro 1, though they have relaxed their standards lately. If you look at my portfolio on iStock, you'll see that a lot my recent images are shot with the Fuji (Milford Sound in New Zealand, windmill in the Chilterns etc).

Truth be told, if I was off tomorrow on a trip I wouldn't hesitate to take the Fuji over my Canon, and I know that over 95% of the stuff I submit would be accepted by iStock.

As for the poppy shot... cannot remember exactly what I did, probably just reduced saturation a bit. Hope that helps

Cheers

Simon

Reply
Simon Bradfield
4/1/2014 10:33:13 am

Hi there Nishi

I'm happy to say I've had very few issues/rejections with iStock with the X-Pro 1, though they have relaxed their standards lately. If you look at my portfolio on iStock, you'll see that a lot my recent images are shot with the Fuji (Milford Sound in New Zealand, windmill in the Chilterns etc).

Truth be told, if I was off tomorrow on a trip I wouldn't hesitate to take the Fuji over my Canon, and I know that over 95% of the stuff I submit would be accepted by iStock.

As for the poppy shot... cannot remember exactly what I did, probably just reduced saturation a bit. Hope that helps

Cheers

Simon

Reply
Nishi Sharma link
4/1/2014 10:45:52 am

Thanks Simon for your helpful reply. I had few of my images rejected from GWI precisely for saturation being higher than they 'like'. It's a tricky one, very subjective of course.

On a different note have you come across this article:

http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2013/dec/13/death-of-photography-camera-phones

My business has been seriously effected in the light of the above article.

Best wishes - Nishi

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Simon is a photographer specialising in landscape & travel imagery. His work has been used around the world in books, magazines, adverts & websites. As of mid 2014 he branched out into wedding photography and photographic tuition.

    Archives

    November 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Small Print About Intellectual Property
Copyright of all images on this website is owned by Simon Bradfield. Images may not be reproduced, copied, transmitted or manipulated without prior permission.